Rockbridge Global Village, Inc.
RGV HOME
 

Click To Download

Free e-mail
 
Search Engine Google to Offer Free E-mail
By Michael Liedtke
The Associated Press
Thursday, April 1, 2004; 7:50 AM

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. - Google Inc. is introducing a free e-mail service to send a blunt message - the maker of the world's most popular online search engine is pulling off the gloves in its clash with high-tech heavyweights Yahoo! Inc. and Microsoft Inc.

The company unleashed the latest blow in a fierce fight for Web supremacy late Wednesday by promising to deliver 250 to 500 times more storage space than the market-leading e-mail services provided by Yahoo and Microsoft's Hotmail.

But there's a catch to the e-mail. Hoping to turn a profit from the service - dubbed Gmail - privately held Google has programmed its computers to dissect the topics being discussed in the e-mails and then deliver text-based ads related to the subjects.

For instance, an e-mail from one friend to another discussing an upcoming concert might prompt Google to include an advertising link from a ticketing agency.

"I don't think (the ads) will be annoying at all," Google co-founder Larry Page said during an interview Wednesday. "We think this will give us a business model that will work and allow us to provide a high-quality service."

Page said Gmail shouldn't raise serious privacy concerns because Google plans to closely guard the content of the e-mail messages. Ads are unlikely to accompany most e-mails, he said.

Gmail will offer 1 gigabyte of storage space, roughly 500,000 pages of e-mail. Gmail users will be able to receive up to 10 megabytes in a single e-mail - more than the free services of Yahoo and Microsoft's Hotmail allow to be stored in an entire mailbox.

Yahoo offers up to 4 megabytes of free e-mail storage while Hotmail provides 2 megabytes of free storage. Both services charge for additional space.

Gmail also will enable its users to type a keyword into a built-in search box to find information contained in their e-mailboxes within a matter of seconds.

For now, Mountain View, Calif.-based Google is only opening up the service to invited users but expects to make it accessible to everyone within a few weeks, Page said. People interested in signing up for an e-mail account are being encouraged to register at www.gmail.com.

Google's e-mail expansion is likely to escalate its mounting competition with Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Yahoo and Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft.

While those two giants have been revving up their own search technology, Google has recently unveiled a series of improvements to protect its turf.

By offering e-mail, Google is now invading a space dominated by Yahoo and Microsoft's Hotmail.

Yahoo has 52.6 million unique users per month in the United States, according to a February survey by online research firm comScore Media Metrix. Hotmail is next, with 45.4 million users. AOL has 40.2 million users, but they pay monthly subscriptions.

Officials at Yahoo and Microsoft's Hotmail division declined to comment on Google's entry into the new category.

Google had been testing its e-mail service for about a year internally before deciding to offer it to the general public.

"We think e-mail is one of those things that is not as useful and as well organized as it should be," Page said. "People have been asking us to do this for a long time."

---

AP Business Writer Rachel Konrad in San Francisco contributed to this report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
R G V  N E W S L E T T E R


APRIL 2004

Welcome to the Rockbridge Global Village, Inc. Newsletter. We have selectively found information and articles that may be of interest to our customers.  We hope that you find information and topics within this newsletter interesting and useful.


Topics in this newsletter:

Lawmakers Push Prison for Online Pirates
Google to offer Free E-mail
The Promise of a Broader Superhighway
Voice Operated Web Browser in the Works
Bush Wants Cheap Internet Access for All by 2007
Cameraphone Sales Surge!


Lawmakers Push Prison for Online Pirates
March 31, 2004
By David McGuire, Washington Post Staff Writer

People who illegally trade large amounts of copyrighted music online could face up to three years in jail under a bill approved today by a congressional panel.

A House Judiciary subcommittee unanimously approved the "Piracy Deterrence and Education Act of 2004," which would be the first law to punish Internet music pirates with jail time if it were signed into law.

The bill targets people who trade more than 1,000 songs on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks like Kazaa and Morpheus, as well as people who make and sell bootlegged copies of films still in cinematic release. It also calls on the FBI to create a piracy deterrence program and would require the Justice Department to launch an anti-piracy education program. Furthermore, the bill would authorize $15 million for the department to spend in 2005 to prosecute copyright infringement cases.

"We have a paucity of criminal copyright prosecutions," said Howard Berman (D-Calif.), who co-sponsored the bill with Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). "It's become clear that law enforcers need additional authority."

Citing illegal downloading as a major cause of declining sales, the music industry is pursuing a legal offensive against people who illegally share copyrighted music online.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has sued more than 1,000 people, and reached hundreds of settlements worth thousands of dollars each.

"This is a common sense bill that ensures that federal prosecutors have the tools and expertise they need to fully enforce the laws on the books," said RIAA chief executive Mitch Bainwol in a prepared statement. "There is also a role for the federal government to help educate the public about theft of copyrighted works on the Internet."

"I don't think this is going to result in hundreds of cases, but even if it results in some number, it sends a message that criminal copyright infringement, even on peer-to-peer networks, will result in prosecutions," said David Green, a vice president at the Motion Picture Association of America.

The RIAA blames file sharing for taking a major bite out of CD sales, which fell from a high of $13.2 billion in 2000 to $11.2 billion in 2003, a period that matches the growth of online music piracy services. File sharing advocates counter that the flagging economy and rising CD prices are more to blame for driving down sales.

Nobody has yet faced jail time because existing copyright law makes it difficult to prove that a file swapper is guilty of a criminal offense, experts said. For criminal penalties, prosecutors must prove that a music pirate acted "willfully," either sharing for financial gain or distributing music with a total retail value higher than $1,000.

Most file sharers say that there is nothing wrong with downloading free music as long as it is for personal use, according to a Harris Interactive survey conducted in January.

That would change under the bill, which says that anyone who knowingly makes 1,000 or more copyrighted works available in their "shared" folder on a file-sharing network would be guilty of criminal copyright infringement.

At that threshold, many file swappers could face criminal penalties. The average college student has 1,100 illegally copied music files on his/or her computer, according to a survey of more than 1,000 students published this month by Ruckus Network, a Boston-based company that offers legal downloads.

Critics of the bill warned that it could be a dangerous move for Congress to make during an election year.

"Congress needs to think real carefully about whether it wants 12-year olds hauled away in handcuffs for making files available over peer to peer networks," said Gigi Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, a Washington-based civil liberties group. Sohn added that there was "much to be commended in the bill, including the subcommittee's willingness to protect fair-use rights of consumers to use copyrighted material."

The RIAA itself became the target of public outrage when its legal blitz snared underage school children and grandparents suspected of trading copyrighted files online.

Adam Eisgrau, the executive director of P2P United, a lobbying group for file-sharing networks, said he will fight against the bill.

"P2P United has limited resources, particularly compared to the armies successfully deployed by copyright industries, [but] if the public makes itself heard, we are optimistic that the tide can be turned," Eisgrau said.

The bill still must be approved by the Judiciary Committee and the full House of Representatives before going to the Senate.


Voice Operated Web Browser in the Works
March 24, 2004
By CNN.com Technology


OSLO, Norway (AP) -- Opera Software is developing a new Internet browser that allows users to talk to their computer, the company announced Tuesday.

The new browser incorporates IBM's ViaVoice technology, enabling the computer to ask what the user wants and "listen" to the request. Opera declined to give a launch date.

The browser is at its developmental stage. At a demonstration, a pizza order form was promptly displayed when the tester told the computer, "Order pizza." But the browser misinterpreted an order for "a pizza" as "eight pizzas."

"We feel we are on the verge of moving the Web a little bit," said Christen Krogh, head of Opera's software development.

"Voice is the most natural and effective way we communicate," Krogh said. "In the years to come, it will greatly facilitate how we interact with technology."

The computer learns to recognize its users voice, accent and inflections by having them read a list of words into a microphone.

"Hi. I am your browser. What can I do for you?," asked a laptop with the demonstration versions of the browser. The message can easily be changed to suit users, such as greeting them by name.

The demonstration version, so far only in English, is still far from normal casual conversation. Users have to learn to listen to the computer's question, and then wait for a tiny beep before stating their request, a bit like communicating by pressing the transmit key on a simplex radio.

"I would like a medium pizza with extra cheese, mushrooms and salami," a tester told the machine.

The machine checked off the appropriate boxes on the form, but interpreted "a pizza" as "eight pizzas." Then it asked if the order was correct, and fixed the number when told the order was for one pizza.

"Voice has been seen as the next step for years, but there were always problems," Krogh said.

The browser corresponds to simple commands. For example, say "Get AP" and it would go to The Associated Press Internet page.

By embedding IBM's voice technology into Opera's browser, a user can talk to the computer, which will understand and translate into normal code for the Net, Krogh said. The could open up the Internet to users who had been excluded because, for example, they were physically unable to use a keyboard, he added.

Opera is the third-largest browser on the Web, although it is tiny compared to Internet Explorer and Netscape. It has been gaining ground as the browser of choice for hand-held devices, such as mobile telephones and personal data assistants, because it is known as being fast and needing little memory.

IBM's director of embedded speech, Igor Jablokov, said "the new offering will allow us to interact with the content on the Web in a more natural way, first on PCs and in the near future on devices such as cell phones and PDAs."

Opera plans to first launch an English version of the voice browser for Windows, to be followed by versions for other operating systems, including Linux and Symbians.

Oslo-based Opera was founded in 1995 by two former developers for the Norwegian telecommunications group Telenor as an offshoot of a company project.


Bush Wants Cheap High-Speed Internet Access for All by 2007
March 26, 2004
By CNN.com Technology

ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico (Reuters) -- President Bush on Friday urged that affordable high-speed Internet access known as broadband be available to all Americans by 2007.

"We ought to have universal, affordable access to broadband technology by the year 2007," Bush said in a speech focusing mostly on homeownership. "And then we ought to make sure that as soon as possible thereafter consumers have plenty of choices..."

Telephone and cable television companies like Verizon Communications and Comcast Corp. have been competing fiercely to sign up customers to high-speed Internet service, which is seen as a lucrative market.

There is already a fund that subsidizes telephone service in rural areas and for those who cannot afford it. Policymakers have debated whether the Universal Service Fund should also subsidize Internet access to American homes.

They have also been debating what regulations should apply to broadband services. Telephone companies that dominate a market have to share their networks with rivals for telephone service and there have been extensive debates about whether those rules should apply to broadband.

Cable companies do not presently have to share their networks with rivals but some allow subscribers to have an alternative Internet service provider.

There were about 20.6 million homes and small businesses that subscribe to high-speed Internet as of June 2003, the latest data available from the Federal Communications Commission.

More consumers have signed up for the broadband from cable companies, with about 13.7 million lines compared to 7.7 million using telephone companies' digital subscriber line services.


Cameraphone Sales Surge - Sales up by nearly 500%
March 29, 2004
By CNN.com Money

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - One in six mobile phones sold last year had a digital camera in it, an almost five-fold increase over 2002, with Asian vendors leading the way, a survey showed Monday.

U.S.-based market research group Strategy Analytics said 84 million camera phones were sold, or 16 percent of the total handset market, compared with 18 million in 2002.

The cameraphone market overtook the digital compact camera market, which amounted to 49 million units worldwide.

Pictures taken with a mobile phone are of much lower quality than those snapped with digital cameras, in part due to less advanced light sensor chips.

Mobile phones are also too small to contain lenses that can zoom and focus, although phones with such lenses could be on the market in the next few years.

Japan's NEC, which does not even show up in the overall top six of global handset vendors, topped the camera phone table with 13.1 million units shipped.

Finland's Nokia, the world's largest handset maker, came in second at 11 million units.

Samsung Electronics sold 10 million during the year. This is in line with the South Korean company's status as the world's overall number three handset maker.

Japan's Matsushita-owned Panasonic ended fourth with 9.2 million camera phones shipped. Like NEC, Panasonic is absent from the list of top six overall mobile phones vendors.

Japanese-Swedish Sony Ericsson sold 8.2 million units to distributors, its number five position slightly better than its performance as the world's number six seller of mobile phones behind South Korea's LG Electronics.

U.S.-based Motorola and Germany's Siemens were the handset manufacturers replaced by Japanese vendors NEC and Panasonic. Motorola and Siemens are the respective numbers two and four in the overall handset table. The market shares changed during the year, with Nokia, Samsung and Sony Ericsson making up the top three of camera phone makers by the fourth quarter, benefiting from their brand names, scale and strong distribution channels with operators.

Investment bank UBS forecasts camera phone sales will rise to 44 percent of all mobile phones sold in 2004.

Research group Gartner says global handset sales could grow to 580 million units in 2004. 


Rockbridge Global Village, Inc.
312 S. Main Street
Lexington, VA 24450
540-463-4451
www.rockbridge.net


 

Copyright © 2003. Rockbridge Global Village, Inc. All rights reserved.

RGV NEWS
 
Something you would like to see more of in our newsletter?  Topics you want more information about? 

Just email us at info@rockbridge.net

 

 
 
Superhighway
 


The Promise of a Broader Superhighway
April 1, 2004
By Leslie Walker

If Al Gore invented the information superhighway, then President Bush ought to be able to raise the speed limit.

Or so Bush seemed to be saying on Friday when he called for extending high-speed Internet to every U.S. home within three years.

"This country needs a national goal for broadband technology, for the spread of broadband technology," Bush said while campaigning in Albuquerque. "We ought to have a universal, affordable access for broadband technology by the year 2007, and then we ought to make sure as soon as possible thereafter, consumers have got plenty of choices when it comes to purchasing the broadband carrier."

Bush offered no details of how to achieve his goal beyond saying Congress should refrain from taxing broadband access and, in another speech on Tuesday, adding that we need "the right regulatory environment."

For starters, Bush could come up with a fresh definition of "broadband," one of those awful buzzwords whose meaning grows fuzzier with each new technology it's used to describe. Broadband is slang for any form of Internet access faster than dial-up. How much faster depends on who's selling it, and there are lots of competing flavors.

In reality, though, most flavors available to consumers in the United Sates today are still middleband -- the equivalent of barreling down a highway in a car, while real high-speed Internet access is more like air travel. Increasingly, real broadband is available in South Korea, Hong Kong and other parts of Asia, where governments have helped defray the considerable cost of laying fiber-optic lines to many homes.

But it remains tantalizingly elusive in the United States, where the market leaders in high-speed Internet access to homes are the entrenched cable and telephone companies. Both have retrofitted their aging lines to handle digital data transmissions at speeds topping out at a fraction of what glass fiber offers -- in the case of cable, the maximum transmission rate is about 3 million bits per second for data going to a home, and much less for data sent back to the Internet.

There are few formal definitions of broadband, although the Federal Communications Commission once set the threshold at a measly 200,000 bits per second -- roughly four times dial-up speeds. That's pretty slow, and it wouldn't easily allow people to do things online such as watch video, play action games or share high-quality photos. Fiber-optic lines, by contrast, let people move data either to or from the Internet at rates starting at 3 million bits per second and increasing to more than 100 million bits per second.

Technology industry bigwigs have long lobbied Bush to talk publicly about broadband, because they fear the United States is falling behind in what has become a global race to wire the world for a snappier Internet. Why is speed important? Proponents contend that speedier communication will translate to higher personal and business productivity. The idea is that people will learn more when education is just a mouse-click away, and they may be healthier when online preventive medicine and diagnostics are more readily available. Supposedly, commerce will flourish when it's no longer geographically constrained.

By the end of 2003, the United States had increased its broadband population substantially, though it's still a far cry from Korea's on a per-capita basis. The Yankee Group estimates that 21 percent of all American households have high-speed links, a fraction of the 80 percent that have some form of broadband available to them.

To get an idea when more "broad" might show up in our broadband services, I checked in this week with some key players, starting with Verizon Communications, which has announced the phone industry's first fiber-to-the home initiative, to launch this year. Verizon is planning to replace copper wiring with fiber outside 1 million homes this year and says it may do twice as many next year. The company is in super-slow rollout mode, experimenting to see who will buy real broadband before committing to a wider build-out.

Verizon spokesman Mark Marchand said initial speeds offered in its fiber-to-the-premises program will start at twice the maximum 3 million bits per second available from cable companies -- and at comparable prices. Higher speeds will be available at greater cost, he added.

Today, cable Internet service typically costs from $40 to $60 a month, while slower DSL service ranges from $30 to $40 a month.

Next I checked in on satellite, which to date has been an also-ran in broadband because its speeds are lower than cable or DSL -- and its cost is higher. The DirecWay Internet access plan from Germantown's Hughes Network Systems Inc., for example, costs $60 a month and requires a $600 equipment purchase.

But the good news is, Hughes aims to offer a cheaper, faster service by this time next year. Hughes says that in the fall it will launch a new satellite system called Spaceway that will be sold to businesses initially. Hughes plans to make it available to residential users as well by the second quarter of 2005, said Emil Regard, a Hughes vice president.

Equally tantalizing are prospects for Internet access through the electricity grid, the newest broadband contender.

Gaithersburg-based Current Communications Group recently announced two joint ventures with Ohio-based Cinergy Corp., a utility company, to offer broadband Internet access over power lines to Cinergy's electrical customers. The two also plan to market the service to municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives around the country. Current Communications, which developed its special power-line technology over the past four years, says it delivers faster Internet access than cable or DSL.

All told, things aren't looking so bad for broadband. So okay, maybe the odds of President Bush bringing real broadband to your door are about as great as they were for Al Gore inventing the Internet, but it never hurts to have these guys talking it up.

Leslie Walker's e-mail address is walkerl@washpost.com.